Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Insight Into Obama's Attitudes Towards Israel and England

Dr. Richard L. Rubinstein, Yale fellow, "Distinguished Professor of the Year", and Harvard Phd, states that president Obama's intention is to "correct the historical mistake of the creation of the state of Israel." Dr. Rubenstein states that president Obama due to his family heritage is extremely pro Muslim - to the point of "wanting to see the destruction of Israel."

This interview is essential viewing for all of the 80% of American Jewry who voted for the most anti Israel President in U.S. history, Barack Obama.

Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Remembering Ronald Reagan This 4th Of July!

You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on earth, or we will sentence them to take the first step into a thousand years of darkness. If we fail, at least let our children and our children's children say of us we justified our brief moment here. We did all that could be done...... Ronald Reagan

Ronald Reagan, by HistoryByDay

The Daily Show Interview With David Axelrod

Interesting discussion on The Daily Show between Jon Stewart and David Axelrod - I am hoping some day soon Jon Stewart will realize how incompetent this Administration really is - he somewhat alluded to it here. "Is our choice really between an incompetent bureaucracy that doesn't quite regulate properly or free market anarchy?"  Stewart is soft on the administration in his interviews, but he is starting to ask some good pointed questions.

It was too long to post on this blog, but well worth it to view the entire interview.

President Obama's G20 Press Conference

After listening to the President at the press conference at the close of the G20 meeting, I was stunned by what I heard - I had to transcribe his answer from my DVR. I have never been so offended by such an arrogant response. I had to tape it to play it again and make sure I wasn't reacting to his comments inappropriately...I will let you decide.

All right? Last question, Scott Horsley. Where’s Scott?

Q Mr. President, are there steps your administration can take now to build confidence that the U.S. will, in fact, meet its deficit reduction targets in the medium and long term?

THE PRESIDENT: I’m sorry. Could you repeat the question? Put the mic a little closer to you.

Q Are there steps your administration can take now to build confidence that the U.S. will, in fact, meet its deficit reduction goals in the medium and long term?

THE PRESIDENT: Several steps we’ve already begun to take: Number one, as I indicated, the budget that we’re presenting - three years discretionary domestic spending freeze. And I’ve sent a clear signal to the leadership when we met, even if we do not get the entire budget package passed through Congress, that top line number needs to stay firm. And I’m serious about it.

We’ve initiated a whole host of measures to cut programs that aren’t working, including, by the way, in the defense area. Bob Gates has been, I think, as successful as any Secretary of Defense in recent memory in actually killing programs, which I think anybody who follows Washington knows is very - very difficult.

We have instituted PAYGO. And although there were baselines built in that took into account the fact that some of this stuff was not going to be solved overnight, it is starting to provide budget discipline to Congress as they move forward.

And we have set up this fiscal commission who will provide reports starting in November - and one of the encouraging things, although there was resistance, ironically, on the part of some of the Republicans who originally had been co-sponsors of legislation to create the fiscal commission and they, in fact, ended up voting against it - what’s been encouraging, based on what I’m hearing both from Democrats and Republicans, is that there’s been a serious conversation there. People are looking at a whole spectrum of issues to get at what is basically a structural deficit that preceded this financial crisis.

Even if - the financial crisis made it much worse, but even if we had not gone through this financial crisis, we’d still have to be dealing with these long-term deficit problems. They have to do with Medicaid; they have to do with Medicare; they have to do with Social Security. They have to do with a series of structural problems that are not unique to America. Some of it has to do with an aging population. And we’ve got to look at a tax system that is messy and unfair in a whole range of ways.

And so they’re looking at the gamut of steps that are going to be taken. And one of the interesting things that’s happened over the last 18 months as President is for some reason people keep on being surprised when I do what I said I was going to do. So I say I’m going to reform our health care system and people think, well, gosh, that’s not smart politics, maybe we should hold off. Or I say, we’re going to move forward on “don’t ask, don’t tell,” and somehow people say, well, why are you doing that, I’m not sure that’s good politics.

I’m doing it because I said I was going to do it. And I think it’s the right thing to do. And people should learn that lesson about me, because next year when I start presenting some very difficult choices to the country, I hope some of these folks who are hollering about deficits and debt step up, because I’m calling their bluff. And we’ll see how much of that - how much of the political arguments they’re making right now are real, and how much of it was just politics.

All right? Thank you very much, everybody. (Applause.)

Monday, June 28, 2010


Stop the Dodd-Frank Financial Overhaul

Barney Frank and Chris Dodd are not intelligent enough to have written such an enormous, convoluted, power-grabbing, screw big business and the taxpayer, financial reform bill. Dodd even said he didn't know what all was in this bill. It does not even address the whole FNMA, Freddie Mac de-regulation or the credit rating agencies that rated packaged mortgage securities as AAA, that contributed to the financial crisis. Come on, people! It might have their names on it, but this was written, once again, like the health care reform bill, behind closed doors, by people we can only guess about, and passed out of committee at 5:39 am! Do these people not like the light of day? Apparently would stink too much. Let's not let anything pass until they pass a budget...and keep them locked in their room until they do. If no budget gets passed, too bad, so sad, perhaps they should not get paid next year. I want to be the new salary Czar!

For more information on what is actually in this bill, The Heritage Foundation in "The Morning Bell" column, breaks it down in easy to understand sections.

Friday, June 25, 2010

Russia Scraps Capital Gains Tax

Daniel J. Mitchell, a contributor to Cato at Liberty reveals that former communist Russia has been able to manage their government with a 13% flat tax, a tax structure that we should adopt in the United States, and now has announced Russia Scraps Capital Gains Tax. A flat tax is much more fair, everyone would have some "skin in the game" as opposed to the approximately 50% of Americans who pay no income taxes at all.

Boehner Releases “ObamaCare: Three Months of Broken Promises” Report | Republican Leader John Boehner |

Information you should know about the new Health Care Reform Act -

Boehner Releases “ObamaCare: Three Months of Broken Promises” Report Republican Leader John Boehner

Support any and all efforts to repeal it! Share with everyone you know!

The Decline: The Geography of a Recession by LaToya Eg...

Thursday, June 24, 2010

An Open Letter From Jon Voight To President Obama

Jon Voight

June 22, 2010

President Obama:

You will be the first American president that lied to the Jewish people, and the American people as well, when you said that you would defend Israel, the only Democratic state in the Middle East, against all their enemies. You have done just the opposite. You have propagandized Israel, until they look like they are everyone's enemy — and it has resonated throughout the world. You are putting Israel in harm's way, and you have promoted anti-Semitism throughout the world.

You have brought this to a people who have given the world the Ten Commandments and most laws we live by today. The Jewish people have given the world our greatest scientists and philosophers, and the cures for many diseases, and now you play a very dangerous game so you can look like a true martyr to what you see and say are the underdogs. But the underdogs you defend are murderers and criminals who want Israel eradicated.

You have brought to Arizona a civil war, once again defending the criminals and illegals, creating a meltdown for good, loyal, law-abiding citizens. Your destruction of this country may never be remedied, and we may never recover. I pray to God you stop, and I hope the people in this great country realize your agenda is not for the betterment of mankind, but for the betterment of your politics.

With heartfelt and deep concern for America and Israel,

Jon Voight

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

What Has Happened To Us? - Great Commentary

by: Kyle-Anne Shiver

A devout Catholic asks: What has happened to us?

Ms. Shiver is a devout Catholic who freelances for various publications, and is often featured on The American Thinker.

The West, and more specifically, America? Figuring out who is right and who is wrong in the flotilla story is not hard stuff.

For the past three weeks, I've been on vacation, purposely avoiding news of any kind as I sought to refresh my soul. The very first thing I read upon resuming my vigil on the world's affairs was a report describing those despicable Israelis cold-bloodedly murdering a group of innocent peace activists bringing much-needed aid and comfort to the Israeli-victimized Gazans and a companion piece filled with the world's condemnation of Israel. It's not the kind of moral dilemma which anyone over the age of twelve ought to have difficulty resolving.

Having followed Middle East events rather conscientiously for a number of years, I immediately suspected that there was a great deal more to this story. Having watched a Western press grow more and more willfully blind and downright anti-Semitic over three decades greatly increased my skepticism. Seeing my American president blink, blink, and blink again while blathering more inanity about irrelevancies, unable to discern right from wrong, brought me to the brink of gut-wrenching nausea.

What has happened to us? The West, I mean, and more specifically, America?

The Israel Defense Forces are not stupid, for one thing. They had clear video of individual soldiers legally enforcing a two-nation naval blockade for purely defensive purposes. The boat boarded by the IDF had multiple warnings and was peacefully informed that the ship would need to be boarded and inspected for weapons before it could pass to deliver the aid purportedly on board. All perfectly in accordance with international law. Instead of "peace activists," the soldiers -- not drones or missiles or mechanized artillery, mind you, but real men, sons, brothers, husbands, fathers -- were met by an army of savages wielding steel pipes, who overwhelmed the soldiers and beat them without mercy.
The savage gang was fired upon, and nine of them were killed. It was called an Israeli-perpetrated massacre. And I daresay there is not a single American adult who would not defend the actions of the IDF if the men being beaten were among their own sons, brothers, husbands, or fathers.

A Chicago police officer attempting to inspect a car trunk for illegal drugs who is surrounded by a gang and beaten with steel pipes certainly has the right to use his gun and depend upon his partner to do so. An American soldier disarming people by law in the wake of Katrina, if met by a gang wielding clubs against him, would fire in self-defense. Would we have the same difficulty condemning the real law-breakers? I don't think so. Figuring out who is right and who is wrong in this situation is not hard stuff. It's not the kind of moral dilemma which anyone over the age of twelve ought to have difficulty resolving. No, it isn't Auschwitz, at least not yet. It isn't the blueprints for massive "ovens," at least not yet, but the leaders of Israel's enemy states have publicly declared over and over again their intentions to perpetrate Holocaust II at the first opportunity.

No, understanding the Israeli position as the only morally defensible one in the region is not difficult. It's the kind of elementary morality that any good parent hopes to have instilled in his children before they reach middle school.

So again, I ask myself, what has happened to us as a civilization?

Why are the Israelis having to spend precious time and energy trying to convince the rest of the world of the justness of their cause? A cause that is simply about surviving in peace while surrounded by historical throwbacks to the 7th century?

When the Israelis finally bent to world pressure in 2005 and left Gaza -- forcefully uprooting their own people, and even being so thorough as to take the dead Jews from their cemeteries -- they were acting in good faith, attempting to trade land for peace. The Palestinians could have become good neighbors, could have asked for the helping hand of do-gooders around the world for rebuilding moneys and assistance. The world would have been generous. The Israelis themselves offered such assistance.

Instead, the Palestinians took to using Gaza exactly as they had before the Israeli occupation: to perpetrate war. Nearly ten thousand rockets have rained down on innocent Israelis since the land-for-peace deal was made. Those rockets have killed hundreds of Israelis, nearly all civilians. And, in fact, the Israelis do send food and medicine daily into the Gaza that assaults them without mercy.

Now, if peace is really the only objective, the Israelis could have peace by this time tomorrow, and the only thing they would need to do to achieve it is to march quietly into an Iranian-built "oven." The Arabs would all be happy. The Muslim world would rejoice immediately, and all would be well in the entire region. All American troops could come home from the Middle East. President Obama could bow as much as he pleased and play golf the rest of the time.

About a year ago, I shamelessly berated a dear Jewish friend for becoming paranoid about unfolding events -- not in Israel, but right here in America. She, naturally, sees things differently from how I do. She was noticing the telltales in American foreign policy under the new administration. She was calling my attention to signs I couldn't then read. Perhaps a part of me simply wanted to believe -- with all my heart and soul -- that nothing whatsoever similar to the Holocaust could ever happen again because we good Americans would never, ever, ever permit such a horror on our watch. I argued this point with my friend vehemently. For a while, we were so passionately at odds on the "Jewish question" that we stopped corresponding and talking on the phone. Now I shake with guilt and shame over my callous insensitivity, and I wonder where I found such faith in the American people and such naive blindness about human evil.
We have clearly elected an anti-Semitic president. I say this with due trepidation; I take the charge as seriously as any I know. Barack Obama's anti-Semitism is so transparent that I tremble to consider that it may not even be merely an intellectual Israel-vs.-Arab-nation prejudice, but may actually be racist, or even a soul-disordered hate for all things deigned by G-d.

Consider Obama's presidential record on judging events. When lawyer Obama heard only scant details of Professor Gates' arrest, he didn't bat an eyelash before publicly declaring that the police "acted stupidly." When President Obama learned of Chavez-wannabe Zelaya being exiled from Honduras, he took the side of Zelaya without even the slightest hesitation, and he even threw the weight of the entire U.S. government against the tiny, struggling Honduran democracy. When Eric Holder announced that he intended to grant the 9/11 terrorists civilian trials in the heart of NYC, President Obama needed no time to study the issue, gather all the facts, or hold any public investigations on the matter. President Obama seems to have no difficulty whatsoever taking sides.

Yet whenever the president is confronted with events in which Jews or Muslims are concerned, we encounter an altogether different Obama persona. We see the dodger. We see the presumed thinker. We see the lawyer calling for all the facts, all the wider ramifications, all the possible contingencies. In every instance of terrorist killing or foiled killing since taking office, President Obama has dodged the one word that fits: "Muslim." He has removed every mention of Islam from all intelligence material on terrorism. Since day one of his presidency, we have seen a man seemingly going out of his way to soothe the hurt feelings of Muslims, all the while publicly insulting and humiliating the Jewish Prime Minister of Israel. Now, with clear film showing soldiers mercilessly beaten by a savage gang and firing in self-defense, the president dithers, joins an immoral U.N. condemnation of the Israelis, and continues to "gather facts."

Remembering the fears of my Jewish friend, I must now ask whether Barack Obama is signaling to the entire Muslim world that Israel is theirs for the taking, that America will stand aside and twiddle our collective thumbs while Iran and her Muslim neighbors finally get to carry out Holocaust II.

And for the very first time in my life, I am ashamed of my country.

The only thing I can add is that I now declare myself, a devout Catholic, Jewish too. And it would seem the only moral thing any of us can do is to proclaim this as loudly and as furiously as we can. When Helen Thomas says the Jews need to go back to Poland and Germany, and those on a "peace flotilla" tell an Israeli soldier to "go back to Auschwitz," and a president looks the other way while evil parades as good right under his nose, then the time for silence has passed. There is a quirky verse in the book of Genesis which any G-d-fearing person ought now heed, in my opinion - speaking of the Jews, His chosen people, G-d told Abraham: "I will bless those who bless you, and the one who curses you I will curse."

(Reprinted, with the author's permission, from The American Thinker)

Remember These Words:

In Germany they first came for the Communists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.
Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Catholics,
and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant.
Then they came for me -
and by that time no one was left to speak up.


Saturday, June 19, 2010

The U.N. - It Is Not Worth It To U.S. Anymore

Our country spent over Half a Billion Dollars in 2009, which is 22% of the United Nations regular budget. Not only are we not getting the proper respect and representation we deserve from this organization, the agenda of the U.N. is becoming increasingly hostile to the principles and liberties we are able to enjoy in this great country. The recent appointment in April of Iran to the U.N. Commission on the Status of Women was the first blow.  The Iranian Regime does not believe in gender equality. Now the OIC, which is the Organization of the Islamic Conference, pushed through a  resolution that creates a watchdog to monitor how religion is portrayed in the media.  The United Nations Council Backs Censorship Watchdog explains that the OIC has gained tremendous sway in the United Nations. This is a direct violation of the First Amendment of our Constitution. They have also appointed a Cuban and an anti-American politician to the Human Rights Council and Advisory Council.

The Bush Administration refused to participate and boycotted the U. N.'s Human Rights Council because China, Cuba, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria and other countries have abysmal human rights records. The Obama Administration, under U. N. Ambassador Susan Rice, has said that they have participated in order to strengthen and reform the Human Rights Council.

We are being used! It is time to get out of the U. N., and get the U. N. out of America!

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Petition The President

Please read the attached petition that is being sent to the President, and if you agree and want your voice to be heard, send it - you can do so anonymously if you so choose. Now is the chance for you to let it be known that the spending in Washington must stop before we bankrupt this country. It would be shameful and irresponsible of us to pass our debt on to our children and grandchildren. Please join me in this effort. Thank you.

Click here to read and sign the petition America's Ultimatum

Monday, June 14, 2010

In A Chess Game World Our President Plays Checkers

Think about it – The objective in checkers is to jump and take as many of your opponent’s pieces until you get to their side, then you say “KING ME” , and you get to move back across the board jumping and taking every one of your opponent’s pieces. Isn’t this what President Obama is doing? He jumped AIG, GM, Chrysler, the American people with the majority-opposed Obamacare, and he is set to jump all of us once again with the Cap and Trade Bill. Waiting in the wings is financial regulation. If these are enacted he will have essentially taken control of over 70% of the free market. Seventy percent (70%) of the free market under the control of the Federal Government! And he has been able to accomplish this in only 18 months since being sworn into office.

The latest crisis of the BP oil spill is a perfect example. Instead of understanding the urgency of acting quickly to ameliorate the extent of the damage, President Obama fails to act at all for several days. Maybe he was told by BP that they had the situation under control. That does not absolve him from the responsibility of sending experts to the scene to assess the problem. I would hate to opine that because of his cozy relationship with BP and all of the money that he received from them over the years, he failed to act because of their assurances that they would end the spill quickly. In the meantime he received 21 aid offers from 17 countries and 4 international groups, who offered to provide tankers and assistance to help us. He refused, deferring to The Jones Act, which limits ships allowed to go from port to port to U.S. flag flying ships only. He could easily, and I am sure with the support of each and every American, have waived that due to the emergency of the situation. President Bush did that during Hurricane Katrina for a two week period. I would hate to think his alliances with the labor unions took precedence over his responsibility as our Commander-in-Chief to protect our shores and waterways. Where exactly does his allegiance lie?

I am no scientist or expert, but my principal concern in the first 3 days was that we need to protect our shore lines, whatever it takes. Get booms in there several miles away from the shore line and post tankers outside of the booms and have them suck up all the oil they could, continually, until this gets resolved and the leak is repaired. Now that this mess has hit shore lines, the amount of damage has been dramatically increased. Our whole ecological system will be drastically altered, if not destroyed, for decades.

 Bobby Jindal Governor of Louisiana requested to build barrier islands to help keep the oil from coming ashore and into the marshlands.

Our President does nothing for days, and then orders a moratorium on all offshore drilling for 6 months. So on top of this already horrendous situation, he has in fact put hundreds of thousands of people out of work. And one thing this country does not need is more people unemployed. He appears unable to comprehend or calculate the effects of his decisions.

Under the new Health Care Reform Bill (which it is now obvious no one had read, but voted on anyway) they failed to understand what would happen as a result of the passage of the bill on private companies and individuals. When several large corporations (AT&T, Verizon,  Caterpillar, John Deere, and others) issued statements that their profits would be affected by up to One Billion Dollars, they were vilified by Congress, who were astounded that they could do such a thing. They were called to appear before a hearing to “explain themselves.” What they failed to remember is that under the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002  that they passed, in Section 409 a corporation is required to disclose to the public, on an urgent basis, when they become aware of material changes in their financial conditions or operations. When Henry Waxman realized what would happen if a hearing occurred he silently cancelled the hearing.

Effective leaders understand that the decisions they make are more akin to playing chess. Chess requires an extremely agile mind, one that can look at the whole board and with every move is able to foresee the resulting effect of that move on that and future possible moves by themselves and their opponent.

Every move this man makes causes an effect that he does not seem to be capable of anticipating.

• His “apology tour” has resulted in weakening our position in the eyes of the world and I fear has left us more vulnerable to our enemies. What could go wrong with that?

• His comments, and those of senior members of his administration (who apparently had not even read the bill), and allowing the President of Mexico to decry the actions of the state of Arizona in passing a law addressing their very serious immigration issue is another example of action without foresight. This resulted in increased violence and action on the part of illegal aliens and the bleeding heart liberals (many of whom are elected officials) who cannot seem to understand the importance of enforcing the immigration laws of this country and protecting the safety of our borders and citizens.

• His embarrassingly poor treatment of Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel during his visit to the White House, along with his obvious bypass of a visit there while on his Arab country tour. Now he is supporting the U. N. conducting an investigation into the Gaza flotilla violence. All of this has caused the world to look at what had been long understood as an unshakable alliance between our two countries as tenuous at best. What could go wrong with that?

• His new Nuclear Arms Control Treaty with Russia which will result in us giving up more of our nuclear stockpile. There was an impasse at one point with President Medvedev. The Russians were pushing for constraints on missile defense to be incorporated into the treaty. What could go wrong with that?

• His continuing insistence that he can persuade Iran out of their nuclear ambitions with his superior diplomatic ability. What could go wrong with that?

• He and his administration failing to publicly acknowledge that we are repeatedly being attacked by one particular faction – radical Islamic terrorists. They can not even say those words. What could go wrong with that?

But the biggest problem President Obama will soon be facing will be from the people who voted for him who were promised so much during his campaign. He promised “free” health care, which apparently will not be so free. He promised to bring our troops home from Iraq. He promised to close Guantanamo Bay. He promised to repeal don’t ask don’t tell in the military. He promised the creation of millions of jobs with the stimulus package.

I am not sure if President Obama is that unaware, or if this is all a calculated plan to tear down this beautiful country. We are now looking at potentially existential threats from without and from within.

My question is - At what point will he just say “KING ME”?

Harry Reid - Income Tax Is Voluntary

Is he serious?

Sunday, June 13, 2010

The Awakening of the Pro-Life Woman

Since 1973 and the Supreme Court decision on Roe vs. Wade, which allowed  a woman to obtain a legal abortion and exercise her "constitutional right" to choose, there has been a tremendous amount of new technology developed. Sonograms and ultrasounds can now "see" a developing baby long before the mother is able to experience the "quickening" of that child. When Roe vs. Wade was first decided, that technology was not yet available. An abortion center could easily convince an expectant mother that this child growing inside of her was just a jumble of unformed cells, not yet a potential "life". I believe that today we are able to understand, by seeing with our own eyes, that this "life"  is so much more than "a jumble of cells" very early into a pregnancy. I strongly believe that this is what has caused such an increase in the number of women and men who have advocated a Pro Life position. The ugly truth is that the Pro Choice people were actually pushing their agenda of "population control" of "undesirables". These are people whom they considered would be a detriment and drain on society, not able to contribute anything of value to the "collective". This has been perhaps the worst form of discrimination against minorities that we have experienced since the Civil Rights Act of the 1960's. And it was all tied up nice and neatly by advocating a women's "right to choose". After all, what could be more agreeable than giving them a right? Our president made a statement during his campaign, when asked about his position on abortion, that he was pro-choice. After all, he would not want one of his daughters being punished with an unwanted child! Punished! I suspect this statement was a direct belief that somehow his mother had been punished by having him. This issue continues to come up again and again and I truly feel at some point in the near future that there will be a new look at a woman's right to choose. The paradigm is shifting.

Liberals mugged by ObamaDem reality, now the healing can begin

Mike DeVine provides a common-sense approach to America's reliance on oil in his column Liberals mugged by ObamaDem reality, now the healing can begin with comments from Scott Brown, R. Mass. as he voted for the Murkowski Resolution S.J. 26 on Thursday. It was voted down by 47-53. What he did not comment on forcefully enough is the devastating impact that passage of the Cap and Trade Bill will have on the people of this country, and the underlying scheme of the United Nations to "force" a redistribution of wealth from the American people to our less-developed neighbors of the globe. The passage of this bill would be a giant step to advance Agenda 21 and the mission of Global Sustainability, whose ultimate goal is Global Governance. Please educate yourself and your family and friends so we can work to stop this path to our own destruction.

Saturday, June 12, 2010

Van Jones - BHO and Valerie Jarrett Buddy - STORM Handbook

This is a direct link to Glenn Beck's page, where you can download and print Van Jones' STORM Handbook

Glenn Beck - Current Events & Politics - STORM Handbook

Friday, June 11, 2010

Indonesia Gets Billion Dollar Deal

The 17,000 island country of Indonesia agrees to curb their commercial deforestation in exchange for One Billion Dollars from the U.N. The challenge will be to enforce and monitor their compliance. This is the newest scheme being utilized by the U.N. even after there was no agreement or consensus last year at Copenhagan on global climate change policy.

The Global Vision For A Sustainable Future

I have found this very well researched  report on the international activities and individuals and groups involved in implementing the Global Transformation into a One World Order. Very scary stuff, you must read this! Do you understand what is happening in our country and the entire world to achieve this goal? They are working at every level of society, beginning with brainwashing our children to plans to take away our freedoms and personal property. We must educate everyone we know with this information. If we don't keep our eyes and ears open, it could happen. The momentum on this issue is staggering.

A New IPCC - Multinational Body for Nature Research

From France and Japan Create an IPCC for Nature to follow the destruction of flora and fauna worldwide.

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

EPA's Global Warming Power Grab is Now About Oil Spills?

Very good column from Christopher C. Horner at Big Government regarding the changing revisions or "spin" on the Clean Air Act (Cap and Trade Bill) where the EPA is being challenged on their POWER GRAB to regulate carbon emissions by Senator Lisa Murkowski's  (R- Alaska) S.J. Resolution 26:
EPA’s Global Warming Power Grab is Now About Oil Spills? I urge you to contact your congressmen and women to vote YES on Murkowski's S.J. Resolution 26. The vote is scheduled for June 10th, 2010.

As I have stated before, this is an extremely important issue. Our very Constitutional system of checks and balances is at stake.

Tuesday, June 8, 2010

Brilliant Video - "U @ 50" AARP Contest

This is only a 1 minute 44 second long video, but it is brilliant.
Make sure you read as well as listen ... forward and backward.
This is a video that was submitted in a contest by a 20 year old.
The contest was titled "u @ 50" by AARP.
This video won second place.

When they showed it, everyone in the room was awe-struck and broke into spontaneous applause. So simple and yet so brilliant.

Take a minute and watch it.

Dennis Prager - We Are Our Problem!


This video was filmed aboard the "humanitarian" flotilla ship purporting to be bringing aid to Gaza. It is apparent that the Palestinian Muslims on board knew what their purpose was, either Martyrdom or reaching Gaza, with Martyrdom being preferred.

Monday, June 7, 2010

Alinsky's Star Pupil Uses 'Rules' As A Manual For 'Social Surgery' -

You must read this article about President Obama - Alinsky's Star Pupil Uses 'Rules' As A Manual For 'Social Surgery' - Our President's implementation of Alinsky's "Rules For Radicals" in his campaign and all through his presidency to date, reveals to us that a very methodical, immoral, and treacherous person is now in charge of this great country, with the goal to "fundamentally transform" it into something we do not recognize. This agenda must be stopped. Vote all of them out in November! We must "fundamentally transform" our Congress in November by electing conservative, constitutional abiding representatives who are willing and determined to put a halt to this Administration's power grab and repeal Obamacare and stop the unsustainable spending spree.

Gov. Chris Christie Takes On The Teachers Union in N.J.

I hope Governor Christie can "right the ship" in New Jersey, then run for President and "right our ship!" Chris Christie for President 2012!

Just Wanted You To Know - Your Tax Money At Work

Check out this link to see how your tax money is being spent on a new IRS facility:

Tweet of the Week: New IRS Facility Will Have The Nicest Amenities Your Money Can Buy The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.

Saturday, June 5, 2010

Rally to Protest the Mosque at Ground Zero on Sunday June 6

The Cordoba Initiative is planning to build a mosque within 2 blocks of Ground Zero, with the opening being scheduled for 9/11/11, exactly 10 years from 9/11/01! Do not believe this is an attempt to "heal" America - it is a blatant display of disrespect for every one of us who have lost loved ones in the most horrific acts of terrorism in our country, and everyone who considers themselves to be true patriotic Americans should protest this and do everything they can to stop it. These people do not regard us as anything but infidels and this mosque, if allowed to exist, will only reinforce and support their agenda to infiltrate every facet of our country. It will embolden them to teach hatred of this country to their children and very quickly they will push to have America bow down to the laws of Sharia. They are laughing at us. You must understand this. Our government is ignoring and allowing this hateful "political-religious ideology" to pursue their agenda under the guise of diversity and acceptance. This group is based on hatred of any people who are not Muslim and want us to become subservient to Islam, or be annihilated. They erect mosques to show their dominance over the infidels they have conquered. This is no "peace" act, it is an act of triumph and dominance over what they have accomplished in America.

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

The White House Calls In James Cameron?

To help assist with the BP oil spill? I sure hope they understand that he didn't really shoot the Abyss or The Titanic using deep water technology....that can not be possible, can it? They do know they were just movies, right? Fiction, not reality.